CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community
← Back to Hollow Section theory

Hollow Section Worked Example - SHS to Eurocode 3

A complete Eurocode 3 capacity check for a representative square hollow section (SHS) - classification, cross-section bending, lateral-torsional buckling and compression buckling, computed by the EC3 engine.

Hollow sections are closed profiles with very high torsional stiffness, and this worked example shows how that changes the Eurocode 3 checks. The section is classified - using the d/t ratio for CHS or the web and flange slenderness for SHS/RHS - and the cross-section resistances N_pl,Rd, M_c,y,Rd, M_c,z,Rd and V_pl,Rd are derived.

A square hollow section (SHS) has equal stiffness about both axes and a circular hollow section (CHS) has no weak axis at all, so neither develops lateral-torsional buckling: their buckling resistance equals the cross-section bending resistance, M_b,Rd = M_c,Rd. Only a rectangular hollow section (RHS) is checked for LTB. The compression buckling resistance N_b,Rd and the combined interaction (clauses 6.2.9 and 6.3.3) complete the check. Because closed sections are not susceptible to torsional deformation, the Annex B interaction factors take their simpler form. Every value matches the interactive hollow-section capacity tool.

Representative section SHS 140×140×8 in grade S355 is Class 1. Major-axis bending resistance Mc,y,Rd = 72.4 kNm, minor-axis Mc,z,Rd = 72.4 kNm, axial squash Npl,Rd = 1477 kN, and compression buckling Nb,Rd = 572 kN at 6 m.

Section properties
Mass
32.6 kg/m
Area, A
41.6 cm²
Iᵧ (major)
1200.0 cm⁴
I_z (minor)
1200.0 cm⁴
iᵧ
5.36 cm
i_z
5.36 cm
Cross-section resistances
Class
1
Mc,y,Rd
72.4 kNm
Mc,z,Rd
72.4 kNm
Npl,Rd
1476.8 kN
Vpl,Rd
426.3 kN

Cross-section & member checks - full derivation

Material
Yield strength
fy=355.0 N/mm2(S355)f_y = 355.0\ \mathrm{N/mm^{2}}\quad (S355)
Material factor
ε=235fy=0.8136\varepsilon = \sqrt{\dfrac{235}{f_y}} = 0.8136
Cross-section classification (§5.5)
Web
cw=h3t=116.0 mm, cwt=14.5072ε=58.58Web Class 1c_w = h - 3t = 116.0\ \mathrm{mm},\ \dfrac{c_w}{t} = 14.50 \le 72\varepsilon = 58.58 \Rightarrow \text{Web Class 1}
Flange
cf=b3t=116.0 mm, cft=14.5033ε=26.85Flange Class 1c_f = b - 3t = 116.0\ \mathrm{mm},\ \dfrac{c_f}{t} = 14.50 \le 33\varepsilon = 26.85 \Rightarrow \text{Flange Class 1}
Governing
Class=max(1, 1)=Class 1\text{Class} = \max(1,\ 1) = \mathbf{Class\ 1}
Cross-section resistances (§6.2)
Axial squash, Npl,Rd (§6.2.4)
Npl,Rd=AfyγM0=4160×355.01.0×103=1,477 kNN_{pl,Rd} = \dfrac{A f_y}{\gamma_{M0}} = \dfrac{4160 \times 355.0}{1.0 \times 10^{3}} = \mathbf{1,477}\ \mathrm{kN}
Bending, Mc,Rd (§6.2.5, W_{pl})
Mc,Rd=WplfyγM0=204000×355.01.0×106=72.4 kNmM_{c,Rd} = \dfrac{W_{pl} f_y}{\gamma_{M0}} = \dfrac{204000 \times 355.0}{1.0 \times 10^{6}} = \mathbf{72.4}\ \mathrm{kNm}
Shear, Vpl,Rd (§6.2.6)
Vpl,Rd=Avfy3γM0=426 kNV_{pl,Rd} = \dfrac{A_v f_y}{\sqrt3\,\gamma_{M0}} = \mathbf{426}\ \mathrm{kN}
Lateral-torsional buckling
Square hollow section
No weak axisMb,Rd=Mc,Rd=72.4 kNm\text{No weak axis} \Rightarrow M_{b,Rd} = M_{c,Rd} = \mathbf{72.4}\ \mathrm{kNm}
Compression buckling, Nb,Rd (§6.3.1) - Lcr = 6 m
Assumption
Member acts as a column, buckling length Lcr=6 m (the minor z-axis governs)\text{Member acts as a column, buckling length } L_{cr} = 6\ \mathrm{m}\ (\text{the minor } z\text{-axis governs})
Non-dimensional slenderness (z-axis)
λˉz=1.465\bar\lambda_{z} = 1.465
Reduction factor
χz=0.388\chi_{z} = 0.388
Buckling resistance
Nb,z,Rd=χzAfyγM1=572.4 kNN_{b,z,Rd} = \chi_{z}\,\dfrac{A f_y}{\gamma_{M1}} = \mathbf{572.4}\ \mathrm{kN}
Axial + bending interaction (§6.2.9)
Axial ratio (worked at n = 0.3)
n=NEdNpl,Rd=0.30n = \dfrac{N_{Ed}}{N_{pl,Rd}} = 0.30
Reduced major-axis moment, M_N,y,Rd (§6.2.9.1)
MN,y,Rd=Mpl,y,Rd1n10.5a=65.9 kNmM_{N,y,Rd} = M_{pl,y,Rd}\,\dfrac{1-n}{1-0.5a} = \mathbf{65.9}\ \mathrm{kNm}
Reduced minor-axis moment, M_N,z,Rd
MN,z,Rd=65.9 kNmM_{N,z,Rd} = \mathbf{65.9}\ \mathrm{kNm}
Biaxial interaction (Expr 6.41)
(My,EdMN,y,Rd)α+(Mz,EdMN,z,Rd)β1.0(α=2, β=max(5n,1))\left(\dfrac{M_{y,Ed}}{M_{N,y,Rd}}\right)^{\alpha} + \left(\dfrac{M_{z,Ed}}{M_{N,z,Rd}}\right)^{\beta} \le 1.0\quad(\alpha=2,\ \beta=\max(5n,1))
Member stability - combined buckling (§6.3.3, Annex B)
Worked at N_Ed = 172 kN, M_y,Ed = 29.0 kNm, M_z,Ed = 7.2 kNm
ny=NEdNb,y,Rd=0.300,nz=NEdNb,z,Rd=0.300n_y = \dfrac{N_{Ed}}{N_{b,y,Rd}} = 0.300,\quad n_z = \dfrac{N_{Ed}}{N_{b,z,Rd}} = 0.300
Interaction factors (Annex B, Method 2)
kyy=1.116, kyz=0.670, kzy=0.670, kzz=1.116k_{yy} = 1.116,\ k_{yz} = 0.670,\ k_{zy} = 0.670,\ k_{zz} = 1.116
Expression (6.61)
NEdNb,y,Rd+kyyMy,EdMb,Rd+kyzMz,EdMc,z,Rd=0.813 1.0 \dfrac{N_{Ed}}{N_{b,y,Rd}} + k_{yy}\dfrac{M_{y,Ed}}{M_{b,Rd}} + k_{yz}\dfrac{M_{z,Ed}}{M_{c,z,Rd}} = \mathbf{0.813}\ \le 1.0\ \checkmark
Expression (6.62)
NEdNb,z,Rd+kzyMy,EdMb,Rd+kzzMz,EdMc,z,Rd=0.679 1.0 \dfrac{N_{Ed}}{N_{b,z,Rd}} + k_{zy}\dfrac{M_{y,Ed}}{M_{b,Rd}} + k_{zz}\dfrac{M_{z,Ed}}{M_{c,z,Rd}} = \mathbf{0.679}\ \le 1.0\ \checkmark
Run SHS 140×140×8 with your own loads in the tool →

See the design theory behind these checks, or browse the SHS property table.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…