CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

C 12X30 vs PFC 300×90

C 12X30 is an C section from the American AISC Shapes Database; PFC 300×90 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. PFC 300×90 carries more bending: 568 cm³ of plastic modulus against 553.88 cm³, 2.5% more. PFC 300×90 is the lighter of the two at 41.4 kg/m against 44.6 kg/m, a saving of 7.7% on steel weight. Both are about 302 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyC 12X30
C
PFC 300×90
PFC
Difference
Mass44.6 kg/m41.4 kg/m+7.7%
Depth304.8 mm300 mm+1.6%
Width80.5 mm90 mm-10.6%
Web thickness13 mm9 mm+44.4%
Flange thickness12.7 mm15.5 mm-18.1%
Area56.8 cm²52.7 cm²+7.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)6,743 cm⁴7,218 cm⁴-6.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)553.88 cm³568 cm³-2.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)442.45 cm³481 cm³-8.0%
Second moment, minor (Iz)213.1 cm⁴404 cm⁴-47.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)70.792 cm³114 cm³-37.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)1.94 cm2.77 cm-30.0%
Torsion constant (It)35.84 cm⁴28.8 cm⁴+24.4%

C 12X30 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; PFC 300×90 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to PFC 300×90.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, PFC 300×90 has the larger second moment of area: 7,218 cm⁴ against 6,743 cm⁴, a difference of 6.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, PFC 300×90 is the more efficient section: 13.7 against 12.4 cm³ per kg/m, 9.5% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: PFC 300×90 has 114 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 70.792 cm³, 37.9% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. C sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and PFC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 7.7% weight.

In short, PFC 300×90 is the stronger section and PFC 300×90 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

PFC 300×90 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 568 cm³ against 553.88 cm³ - 2.5% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

PFC 300×90 at 41.4 kg/m, against 44.6 kg/m for the other - a saving of 7.7%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: PFC 300×90 gives 568 cm³ of plastic modulus and 7,218 cm⁴ of inertia against 553.88 cm³ and 6,743 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

PFC 300×90, with a second moment of area of 7,218 cm⁴ against 6,743 cm⁴ (6.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

PFC 300×90×41 vs PFC 300×90PFC 300×90×41 vs C 12X30
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…