CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

PFC 300×90×41 vs PFC 300×90

PFC 300×90×41 is a PFC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); PFC 300×90 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 568 cm³ against 568 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 41.4 kg/m and 41.4 kg/m. Both are about 300 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyPFC 300×90×41
PFC
PFC 300×90
PFC
Difference
Mass41.4 kg/m41.4 kg/msame
Depth300 mm300 mmsame
Width90 mm90 mmsame
Web thickness9 mm9 mmsame
Flange thickness15.5 mm15.5 mmsame
Area52.7 cm²52.7 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)7,220 cm⁴7,218 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)568 cm³568 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)481 cm³481 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)404 cm⁴404 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)114 cm³114 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.77 cm2.77 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)28.8 cm⁴28.8 cm⁴same

PFC 300×90×41 to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005; PFC 300×90 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to PFC 300×90.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, PFC 300×90×41 has the larger second moment of area: 7,220 cm⁴ against 7,218 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (13.7 against 13.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. PFC sections are specified to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and PFC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. PFC 300×90×41 has a plastic modulus of 568 cm³ and PFC 300×90 has 568 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: PFC 300×90×41 is 41.4 kg/m and PFC 300×90 is 41.4 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: PFC 300×90 gives 568 cm³ of plastic modulus and 7,218 cm⁴ of inertia against 568 cm³ and 7,220 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

PFC 300×90×41, with a second moment of area of 7,220 cm⁴ against 7,218 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

PFC 300×90×41 vs C 12X30C 12X30 vs PFC 300×90
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…