CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

C 9X20 vs PFC 230×75

C 9X20 is an C section from the American AISC Shapes Database; PFC 230×75 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 276.94 cm³ against 278 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.4%. PFC 230×75 is the lighter of the two at 25.7 kg/m against 29.8 kg/m, a saving of 16.0% on steel weight. Both are about 229 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyC 9X20
C
PFC 230×75
PFC
Difference
Mass29.8 kg/m25.7 kg/m+16.0%
Depth228.6 mm230 mm-0.6%
Width67.3 mm75 mm-10.3%
Web thickness11.4 mm6.5 mm+75.4%
Flange thickness10.5 mm12.5 mm-16.0%
Area37.9 cm²32.7 cm²+15.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)2,535 cm⁴2,748 cm⁴-7.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)276.94 cm³278 cm³-0.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)221.23 cm³239 cm³-7.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)100.3 cm⁴181 cm⁴-44.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)40.312 cm³63.2 cm³-36.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)1.63 cm2.35 cm-30.6%
Torsion constant (It)17.77 cm⁴11.8 cm⁴+50.6%

C 9X20 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; PFC 230×75 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to PFC 230×75.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, PFC 230×75 has the larger second moment of area: 2,748 cm⁴ against 2,535 cm⁴, a difference of 7.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, PFC 230×75 is the more efficient section: 10.8 against 9.3 cm³ per kg/m, 14.1% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: PFC 230×75 has 63.2 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 40.312 cm³, 36.2% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. C sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and PFC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 16.0% weight.

In short, PFC 230×75 is the stronger section and PFC 230×75 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. C 9X20 has a plastic modulus of 276.94 cm³ and PFC 230×75 has 278 cm³, a difference of only 0.4% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

PFC 230×75 at 25.7 kg/m, against 29.8 kg/m for the other - a saving of 16.0%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: PFC 230×75 gives 278 cm³ of plastic modulus and 2,748 cm⁴ of inertia against 276.94 cm³ and 2,535 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

PFC 230×75, with a second moment of area of 2,748 cm⁴ against 2,535 cm⁴ (7.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

PFC 230×75×26 vs PFC 230×75PFC 230×75×26 vs C 9X20
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…