CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 10X17 vs H-250x125x5x8-25.1

W 10X17 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-250x125x5x8-25.1 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 306.44 cm³ against 312 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.8%. They weigh essentially the same, 25.3 kg/m and 25.1 kg/m. W 10X17 is deeper, 256.5 mm against 248 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 10X17
W
H-250x125x5x8-25.1
MB & MC
Difference
Mass25.3 kg/m25.1 kg/m+0.8%
Depth256.5 mm248 mm+3.4%
Width101.9 mm124 mm-17.8%
Web thickness6.1 mm5 mm+22.0%
Flange thickness8.4 mm8 mm+5.0%
Area32.2 cm²32 cm²+0.6%
Second moment, major (Iy)3,409 cm⁴3,450 cm⁴-1.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)306.44 cm³312 cm³-1.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)265.47 cm³278 cm³-4.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)148.2 cm⁴255 cm⁴-41.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)45.884 cm³63.2 cm³-27.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.15 cm2.82 cm-23.8%
Torsion constant (It)6.49 cm⁴5.78 cm⁴+12.3%

W 10X17 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-250x125x5x8-25.1 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-250x125x5x8-25.1.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-250x125x5x8-25.1 has the larger second moment of area: 3,450 cm⁴ against 3,409 cm⁴, a difference of 1.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, H-250x125x5x8-25.1 is the more efficient section: 12.4 against 12.1 cm³ per kg/m, 2.6% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-250x125x5x8-25.1 has 63.2 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 45.884 cm³, 27.4% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 10X17 has a plastic modulus of 306.44 cm³ and H-250x125x5x8-25.1 has 312 cm³, a difference of only 1.8% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 10X17 is 25.3 kg/m and H-250x125x5x8-25.1 is 25.1 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-250x125x5x8-25.1 gives 312 cm³ of plastic modulus and 3,450 cm⁴ of inertia against 306.44 cm³ and 3,409 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-250x125x5x8-25.1, with a second moment of area of 3,450 cm⁴ against 3,409 cm⁴ (1.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 254×102×25 vs W 10X17UB 254×102×25 vs H-250x125x5x8-25.1
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…