CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 10X45 vs HE 260 A

W 10X45 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 260 A is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. HE 260 A carries more bending: 920 cm³ of plastic modulus against 899.65 cm³, 2.2% more. They weigh essentially the same, 67 kg/m and 68.2 kg/m. W 10X45 is deeper, 256.5 mm against 250 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 10X45
W
HE 260 A
HE
Difference
Mass67 kg/m68.2 kg/m-1.8%
Depth256.5 mm250 mm+2.6%
Width203.7 mm260 mm-21.7%
Web thickness8.9 mm7.5 mm+18.7%
Flange thickness15.7 mm12.5 mm+25.6%
Area85.8 cm²86.8 cm²-1.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)10,323 cm⁴10,400 cm⁴-0.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)899.65 cm³920 cm³-2.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)804.6 cm³836 cm³-3.8%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,223 cm⁴3,670 cm⁴-39.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)332.66 cm³430 cm³-22.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.11 cm6.5 cm-21.4%
Torsion constant (It)62.85 cm⁴54.2 cm⁴+16.0%

W 10X45 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 260 A to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 260 A.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 260 A has the larger second moment of area: 10,400 cm⁴ against 10,323 cm⁴, a difference of 0.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (13.4 against 13.5 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: HE 260 A has 430 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 332.66 cm³, 22.6% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, HE 260 A is the stronger section and W 10X45 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

HE 260 A is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 920 cm³ against 899.65 cm³ - 2.2% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: W 10X45 is 67 kg/m and HE 260 A is 68.2 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 260 A gives 920 cm³ of plastic modulus and 10,400 cm⁴ of inertia against 899.65 cm³ and 10,323 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 260 A, with a second moment of area of 10,400 cm⁴ against 10,323 cm⁴ (0.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 10X45 vs H-250x250x8x13HE 260 A vs H-250x250x9x14-71.8
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…