CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 10X45 vs H-250x250x8x13

W 10X45 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-250x250x8x13 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 899.65 cm³ against 883 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.9%. They weigh essentially the same, 67 kg/m and 66.5 kg/m. W 10X45 is deeper, 256.5 mm against 248 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 10X45
W
H-250x250x8x13
MB & MC
Difference
Mass67 kg/m66.5 kg/m+0.8%
Depth256.5 mm248 mm+3.4%
Width203.7 mm249 mm-18.2%
Web thickness8.9 mm8 mm+11.3%
Flange thickness15.7 mm13 mm+20.8%
Area85.8 cm²84.7 cm²+1.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)10,323 cm⁴9,931 cm⁴+3.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)899.65 cm³883 cm³+1.9%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)804.6 cm³801 cm³+0.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,223 cm⁴3,348 cm⁴-33.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)332.66 cm³408 cm³-18.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.11 cm6.29 cm-18.8%
Torsion constant (It)62.85 cm⁴46.7 cm⁴+34.6%

W 10X45 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-250x250x8x13 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-250x250x8x13.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 10X45 has the larger second moment of area: 10,323 cm⁴ against 9,931 cm⁴, a difference of 3.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (13.4 against 13.3 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-250x250x8x13 has 408 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 332.66 cm³, 18.5% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 10X45 has a plastic modulus of 899.65 cm³ and H-250x250x8x13 has 883 cm³, a difference of only 1.9% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 10X45 is 67 kg/m and H-250x250x8x13 is 66.5 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-250x250x8x13 gives 883 cm³ of plastic modulus and 9,931 cm⁴ of inertia against 899.65 cm³ and 10,323 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 10X45, with a second moment of area of 10,323 cm⁴ against 9,931 cm⁴ (3.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 10X45 vs HE 260 A
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…