CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 10X49 vs H-250x250x9x14-72.4

W 10X49 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-250x250x9x14-72.4 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. W 10X49 carries more bending: 989.78 cm³ of plastic modulus against 960 cm³, 3.1% more. They weigh essentially the same, 72.9 kg/m and 72.4 kg/m. Both are about 252 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 10X49
W
H-250x250x9x14-72.4
MB & MC
Difference
Mass72.9 kg/m72.4 kg/m+0.7%
Depth254 mm250 mm+1.6%
Width254 mm250 mm+1.6%
Web thickness8.6 mm9 mm-4.4%
Flange thickness14.2 mm14 mm+1.4%
Area92.9 cm²92.2 cm²+0.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)11,321 cm⁴10,830 cm⁴+4.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)989.78 cm³960 cm³+3.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)894.73 cm³867 cm³+3.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)3,888 cm⁴3,649 cm⁴+6.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)463.75 cm³444 cm³+4.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.45 cm6.29 cm+2.5%
Torsion constant (It)57.86 cm⁴58.7 cm⁴-1.4%

W 10X49 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-250x250x9x14-72.4 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-250x250x9x14-72.4.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 10X49 has the larger second moment of area: 11,321 cm⁴ against 10,830 cm⁴, a difference of 4.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 10X49 is the more efficient section: 13.6 against 13.3 cm³ per kg/m, 2.4% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, W 10X49 is the stronger section and H-250x250x9x14-72.4 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 10X49 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 989.78 cm³ against 960 cm³ - 3.1% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: W 10X49 is 72.9 kg/m and H-250x250x9x14-72.4 is 72.4 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-250x250x9x14-72.4 gives 960 cm³ of plastic modulus and 10,830 cm⁴ of inertia against 989.78 cm³ and 11,321 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 10X49, with a second moment of area of 11,321 cm⁴ against 10,830 cm⁴ (4.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 254×254×73 vs W 10X49UC 254×254×73 vs H-250x250x9x14-72.4
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…