CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 254×254×73 vs W 10X49

UC 254×254×73 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 10X49 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 992 cm³ against 989.78 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.2%. They weigh essentially the same, 73.1 kg/m and 72.9 kg/m. Both are about 254 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 254×254×73
UC
W 10X49
W
Difference
Mass73.1 kg/m72.9 kg/m+0.3%
Depth254.1 mm254 mmsame
Width254.6 mm254 mm+0.2%
Web thickness8.6 mm8.6 mmsame
Flange thickness14.2 mm14.2 mmsame
Area93.1 cm²92.9 cm²+0.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)11,400 cm⁴11,321 cm⁴+0.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)992 cm³989.78 cm³+0.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)898 cm³894.73 cm³+0.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)3,910 cm⁴3,888 cm⁴+0.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)465 cm³463.75 cm³+0.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.48 cm6.45 cm+0.5%
Torsion constant (It)57.6 cm⁴57.86 cm⁴-0.4%

UC 254×254×73 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 10X49 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 10X49.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UC 254×254×73 has the larger second moment of area: 11,400 cm⁴ against 11,321 cm⁴, a difference of 0.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (13.6 against 13.6 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UC 254×254×73 has a plastic modulus of 992 cm³ and W 10X49 has 989.78 cm³, a difference of only 0.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UC 254×254×73 is 73.1 kg/m and W 10X49 is 72.9 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 10X49 gives 989.78 cm³ of plastic modulus and 11,321 cm⁴ of inertia against 992 cm³ and 11,400 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UC 254×254×73, with a second moment of area of 11,400 cm⁴ against 11,321 cm⁴ (0.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 254×254×73 vs H-250x250x9x14-72.4W 10X49 vs H-250x250x9x14-72.4
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…