CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 10X54 vs HP 10X57

W 10X54 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HP 10X57 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1091.4 cm³ against 1089.7 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.2%. W 10X54 is the lighter of the two at 80.4 kg/m against 84.8 kg/m, a saving of 5.2% on steel weight. Both are about 255 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 10X54
W
HP 10X57
HP
Difference
Mass80.4 kg/m84.8 kg/m-5.2%
Depth256.5 mm253.7 mm+1.1%
Width254 mm259.1 mm-2.0%
Web thickness9.4 mm14.4 mm-34.7%
Flange thickness15.6 mm14.4 mm+8.3%
Area101.9 cm²107.7 cm²-5.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)12,612 cm⁴12,237 cm⁴+3.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,091.4 cm³1,089.7 cm³+0.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)983.22 cm³963.56 cm³+2.0%
Second moment, minor (Iz)4,287 cm⁴4,204 cm⁴+2.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)512.92 cm³496.53 cm³+3.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.5 cm6.22 cm+4.5%
Torsion constant (It)75.75 cm⁴82 cm⁴-7.6%

W 10X54 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HP 10X57 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to HP 10X57.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 10X54 has the larger second moment of area: 12,612 cm⁴ against 12,237 cm⁴, a difference of 3.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 10X54 is the more efficient section: 13.6 against 12.9 cm³ per kg/m, 5.6% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

In short, W 10X54 is the stronger section and W 10X54 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 10X54 has a plastic modulus of 1091.4 cm³ and HP 10X57 has 1089.7 cm³, a difference of only 0.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 10X54 at 80.4 kg/m, against 84.8 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.2%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HP 10X57 gives 1089.7 cm³ of plastic modulus and 12,237 cm⁴ of inertia against 1091.4 cm³ and 12,612 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

W 10X54, with a second moment of area of 12,612 cm⁴ against 12,237 cm⁴ (3.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 10X54 vs HE 280 AHE 280 A vs HP 10X57
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…