CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 10X54 vs HE 280 A

W 10X54 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 280 A is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1091.4 cm³ against 1110 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.7%. HE 280 A is the lighter of the two at 76.4 kg/m against 80.4 kg/m, a saving of 5.2% on steel weight. HE 280 A is deeper, 270 mm against 256.5 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 10X54
W
HE 280 A
HE
Difference
Mass80.4 kg/m76.4 kg/m+5.2%
Depth256.5 mm270 mm-5.0%
Width254 mm280 mm-9.3%
Web thickness9.4 mm8 mm+17.5%
Flange thickness15.6 mm13 mm+20.0%
Area101.9 cm²97.3 cm²+4.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)12,612 cm⁴13,700 cm⁴-7.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,091.4 cm³1,110 cm³-1.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)983.22 cm³1,010 cm³-2.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)4,287 cm⁴4,760 cm⁴-9.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)512.92 cm³518 cm³-1.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.5 cm7 cm-7.1%
Torsion constant (It)75.75 cm⁴63.5 cm⁴+19.3%

W 10X54 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 280 A to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 280 A.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 280 A has the larger second moment of area: 13,700 cm⁴ against 12,612 cm⁴, a difference of 7.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, HE 280 A is the more efficient section: 14.5 against 13.6 cm³ per kg/m, 6.6% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 5.2% weight.

In short, HE 280 A is the stronger section and HE 280 A is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 10X54 has a plastic modulus of 1091.4 cm³ and HE 280 A has 1110 cm³, a difference of only 1.7% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

HE 280 A at 76.4 kg/m, against 80.4 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.2%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 280 A gives 1110 cm³ of plastic modulus and 13,700 cm⁴ of inertia against 1091.4 cm³ and 12,612 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 280 A, with a second moment of area of 13,700 cm⁴ against 12,612 cm⁴ (7.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 10X54 vs HP 10X57HE 280 A vs HP 10X57
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…