CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 12X336 vs UC 356×406×467

W 12X336 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; UC 356×406×467 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 9881.4 cm³ against 10000 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.2%. UC 356×406×467 is the lighter of the two at 467 kg/m against 500 kg/m, a saving of 7.1% on steel weight. UC 356×406×467 is deeper, 436.6 mm against 426.7 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 12X336
W
UC 356×406×467
UC
Difference
Mass500 kg/m467 kg/m+7.1%
Depth426.7 mm436.6 mm-2.3%
Width340.4 mm412.2 mm-17.4%
Web thickness45.2 mm35.8 mm+26.3%
Flange thickness75.2 mm58 mm+29.7%
Area638.1 cm²595 cm²+7.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)168,990 cm⁴183,000 cm⁴-7.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)9,881.4 cm³10,000 cm³-1.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)7,915 cm³8,380 cm³-5.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)49,532 cm⁴67,800 cm⁴-26.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)4,490.1 cm³5,030 cm³-10.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)8.81 cm10.7 cm-17.7%
Torsion constant (It)10,114 cm⁴5,810 cm⁴+74.1%

W 12X336 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; UC 356×406×467 to BS EN 10365:2017. Difference is expressed relative to UC 356×406×467.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UC 356×406×467 has the larger second moment of area: 183,000 cm⁴ against 168,990 cm⁴, a difference of 7.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UC 356×406×467 is the more efficient section: 21.4 against 19.8 cm³ per kg/m, 7.7% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: UC 356×406×467 has 5030 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 4490.1 cm³, 10.7% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and UC to BS EN 10365:2017; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 7.1% weight.

In short, UC 356×406×467 is the stronger section and UC 356×406×467 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 12X336 has a plastic modulus of 9881.4 cm³ and UC 356×406×467 has 10000 cm³, a difference of only 1.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

UC 356×406×467 at 467 kg/m, against 500 kg/m for the other - a saving of 7.1%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: UC 356×406×467 gives 10000 cm³ of plastic modulus and 183,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 9881.4 cm³ and 168,990 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and BS EN 10365:2017), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UC 356×406×467, with a second moment of area of 183,000 cm⁴ against 168,990 cm⁴ (7.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 356×406×467 vs W 14X311
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…