CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 356×406×467 vs W 14X311

UC 356×406×467 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 14X311 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 10000 cm³ against 9881.4 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.2%. They weigh essentially the same, 467 kg/m and 462.8 kg/m. Both are about 435 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 356×406×467
UC
W 14X311
W
Difference
Mass467 kg/m462.8 kg/m+0.9%
Depth436.6 mm434.3 mm+0.5%
Width412.2 mm411.5 mm+0.2%
Web thickness35.8 mm35.8 mmsame
Flange thickness58 mm57.4 mm+1.0%
Area595 cm²589.7 cm²+0.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)183,000 cm⁴180,228 cm⁴+1.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)10,000 cm³9,881.4 cm³+1.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)8,380 cm³8,291.9 cm³+1.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)67,800 cm⁴67,013 cm⁴+1.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)5,030 cm³4,981.7 cm³+1.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)10.7 cm10.67 cm+0.3%
Torsion constant (It)5,810 cm⁴5,661 cm⁴+2.6%

UC 356×406×467 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 14X311 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 14X311.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UC 356×406×467 has the larger second moment of area: 183,000 cm⁴ against 180,228 cm⁴, a difference of 1.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (21.4 against 21.4 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UC 356×406×467 has a plastic modulus of 10000 cm³ and W 14X311 has 9881.4 cm³, a difference of only 1.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UC 356×406×467 is 467 kg/m and W 14X311 is 462.8 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 14X311 gives 9881.4 cm³ of plastic modulus and 180,228 cm⁴ of inertia against 10000 cm³ and 183,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UC 356×406×467, with a second moment of area of 183,000 cm⁴ against 180,228 cm⁴ (1.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 12X336 vs UC 356×406×467
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…