CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 12X58 vs H-300x300x9x14

W 12X58 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-300x300x9x14 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1415.8 cm³ against 1389 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.9%. They weigh essentially the same, 86.3 kg/m and 87 kg/m. W 12X58 is deeper, 309.9 mm against 298 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 12X58
W
H-300x300x9x14
MB & MC
Difference
Mass86.3 kg/m87 kg/m-0.8%
Depth309.9 mm298 mm+4.0%
Width254 mm299 mm-15.1%
Web thickness9.1 mm9 mm+1.1%
Flange thickness16.3 mm14 mm+16.4%
Area109.7 cm²111 cm²-1.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)19,771 cm⁴18,850 cm⁴+4.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,415.8 cm³1,389 cm³+1.9%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,278.2 cm³1,265 cm³+1.0%
Second moment, minor (Iz)4,454 cm⁴6,242 cm⁴-28.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)532.58 cm³634 cm³-16.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.38 cm7.51 cm-15.0%
Torsion constant (It)87.41 cm⁴71.3 cm⁴+22.6%

W 12X58 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-300x300x9x14 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-300x300x9x14.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 12X58 has the larger second moment of area: 19,771 cm⁴ against 18,850 cm⁴, a difference of 4.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 12X58 is the more efficient section: 16.4 against 16.0 cm³ per kg/m, 2.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-300x300x9x14 has 634 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 532.58 cm³, 16.0% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 12X58 has a plastic modulus of 1415.8 cm³ and H-300x300x9x14 has 1389 cm³, a difference of only 1.9% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 12X58 is 86.3 kg/m and H-300x300x9x14 is 87 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-300x300x9x14 gives 1389 cm³ of plastic modulus and 18,850 cm⁴ of inertia against 1415.8 cm³ and 19,771 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 12X58, with a second moment of area of 19,771 cm⁴ against 18,850 cm⁴ (4.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 12X58 vs HP 12X63HE 300 A vs H-300x300x9x14
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…