CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 14X211 vs H-400x400x20x35

W 14X211 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-400x400x20x35 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 6391 cm³ against 6311 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.3%. H-400x400x20x35 is the lighter of the two at 283 kg/m against 314 kg/m, a saving of 11.0% on steel weight. H-400x400x20x35 is deeper, 428 mm against 398.8 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 14X211
W
H-400x400x20x35
MB & MC
Difference
Mass314 kg/m283 kg/m+11.0%
Depth398.8 mm428 mm-6.8%
Width401.3 mm407 mm-1.4%
Web thickness24.9 mm20 mm+24.5%
Flange thickness39.6 mm35 mm+13.1%
Area400 cm²361 cm²+10.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)110,718 cm⁴119,200 cm⁴-7.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)6,391 cm³6,311 cm³+1.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)5,538.8 cm³5,570 cm³-0.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)42,872 cm⁴39,360 cm⁴+8.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)3,244.6 cm³2,941 cm³+10.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)10.34 cm10.4 cm-0.6%
Torsion constant (It)1,856 cm⁴1,317 cm⁴+40.9%

W 14X211 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-400x400x20x35 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-400x400x20x35.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-400x400x20x35 has the larger second moment of area: 119,200 cm⁴ against 110,718 cm⁴, a difference of 7.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, H-400x400x20x35 is the more efficient section: 22.3 against 20.4 cm³ per kg/m, 8.7% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 14X211 has 3244.6 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 2941 cm³, 10.3% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 11.0% weight.

In short, W 14X211 is the stronger section and H-400x400x20x35 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 14X211 has a plastic modulus of 6391 cm³ and H-400x400x20x35 has 6311 cm³, a difference of only 1.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

H-400x400x20x35 at 283 kg/m, against 314 kg/m for the other - a saving of 11.0%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-400x400x20x35 gives 6311 cm³ of plastic modulus and 119,200 cm⁴ of inertia against 6391 cm³ and 110,718 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-400x400x20x35, with a second moment of area of 119,200 cm⁴ against 110,718 cm⁴ (7.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…