CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 14X43 vs H-350x175x9x15

W 14X43 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-350x175x9x15 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. H-350x175x9x15 carries more bending: 1180 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1140.5 cm³, 3.3% more. W 14X43 is the lighter of the two at 64 kg/m against 66.2 kg/m, a saving of 3.3% on steel weight. H-350x175x9x15 is deeper, 358 mm against 348 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 14X43
W
H-350x175x9x15
MB & MC
Difference
Mass64 kg/m66.2 kg/m-3.3%
Depth348 mm358 mm-2.8%
Width203.2 mm177 mm+14.8%
Web thickness7.7 mm9 mm-14.4%
Flange thickness13.5 mm15 mm-10.0%
Area81.3 cm²84.3 cm²-3.6%
Second moment, major (Iy)17,815 cm⁴18,710 cm⁴-4.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,140.5 cm³1,180 cm³-3.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,025.8 cm³1,045 cm³-1.8%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,881 cm⁴1,390 cm⁴+35.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)283.5 cm³243 cm³+16.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.8 cm4.06 cm+18.2%
Torsion constant (It)43.7 cm⁴53.6 cm⁴-18.5%

W 14X43 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-350x175x9x15 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-350x175x9x15.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-350x175x9x15 has the larger second moment of area: 18,710 cm⁴ against 17,815 cm⁴, a difference of 4.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (17.8 against 17.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 14X43 has 283.5 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 243 cm³, 16.7% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 3.3% weight.

In short, H-350x175x9x15 is the stronger section and W 14X43 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

H-350x175x9x15 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 1180 cm³ against 1140.5 cm³ - 3.3% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

W 14X43 at 64 kg/m, against 66.2 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.3%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-350x175x9x15 gives 1180 cm³ of plastic modulus and 18,710 cm⁴ of inertia against 1140.5 cm³ and 17,815 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-350x175x9x15, with a second moment of area of 18,710 cm⁴ against 17,815 cm⁴ (4.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 356×171×67 vs H-350x175x9x15
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…