CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 356×171×67 vs H-350x175x9x15

UB 356×171×67 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-350x175x9x15 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. UB 356×171×67 carries more bending: 1210 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1180 cm³, 2.5% more. They weigh essentially the same, 67.1 kg/m and 66.2 kg/m. Both are about 361 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 356×171×67
UB
H-350x175x9x15
MB & MC
Difference
Mass67.1 kg/m66.2 kg/m+1.4%
Depth363.4 mm358 mm+1.5%
Width173.2 mm177 mm-2.1%
Web thickness9.1 mm9 mm+1.1%
Flange thickness15.7 mm15 mm+4.7%
Area85.5 cm²84.3 cm²+1.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)19,500 cm⁴18,710 cm⁴+4.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,210 cm³1,180 cm³+2.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,070 cm³1,045 cm³+2.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,360 cm⁴1,390 cm⁴-2.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)243 cm³243 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.99 cm4.06 cm-1.7%
Torsion constant (It)55.7 cm⁴53.6 cm⁴+3.9%

UB 356×171×67 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-350x175x9x15 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-350x175x9x15.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 356×171×67 has the larger second moment of area: 19,500 cm⁴ against 18,710 cm⁴, a difference of 4.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (18.0 against 17.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, UB 356×171×67 is the stronger section and H-350x175x9x15 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

UB 356×171×67 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 1210 cm³ against 1180 cm³ - 2.5% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: UB 356×171×67 is 67.1 kg/m and H-350x175x9x15 is 66.2 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-350x175x9x15 gives 1180 cm³ of plastic modulus and 18,710 cm⁴ of inertia against 1210 cm³ and 19,500 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 356×171×67, with a second moment of area of 19,500 cm⁴ against 18,710 cm⁴ (4.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 356×171×67 vs IPE O 360W 14X43 vs H-350x175x9x15
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…