CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 14X61 vs H-350x250x10x17

W 14X61 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-350x250x10x17 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1671.5 cm³ against 1699 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.6%. W 14X61 is the lighter of the two at 90.8 kg/m against 94.2 kg/m, a saving of 3.6% on steel weight. W 14X61 is deeper, 353.1 mm against 346 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 14X61
W
H-350x250x10x17
MB & MC
Difference
Mass90.8 kg/m94.2 kg/m-3.6%
Depth353.1 mm346 mm+2.1%
Width254 mm251 mm+1.2%
Web thickness9.5 mm10 mm-5.0%
Flange thickness16.4 mm17 mm-3.5%
Area115.5 cm²120 cm²-3.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)26,639 cm⁴26,440 cm⁴+0.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,671.5 cm³1,699 cm³-1.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,509.2 cm³1,528 cm³-1.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)4,454 cm⁴4,488 cm⁴-0.8%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)537.5 cm³547 cm³-1.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.22 cm6.12 cm+1.6%
Torsion constant (It)91.15 cm⁴109 cm⁴-16.4%

W 14X61 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-350x250x10x17 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-350x250x10x17.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 14X61 has the larger second moment of area: 26,639 cm⁴ against 26,440 cm⁴, a difference of 0.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 14X61 is the more efficient section: 18.4 against 18.0 cm³ per kg/m, 2.1% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 3.6% weight.

In short, H-350x250x10x17 is the stronger section and W 14X61 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 14X61 has a plastic modulus of 1671.5 cm³ and H-350x250x10x17 has 1699 cm³, a difference of only 1.6% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 14X61 at 90.8 kg/m, against 94.2 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.6%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-350x250x10x17 gives 1699 cm³ of plastic modulus and 26,440 cm⁴ of inertia against 1671.5 cm³ and 26,639 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 14X61, with a second moment of area of 26,639 cm⁴ against 26,440 cm⁴ (0.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…