CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 14X74 vs HE 360 A

W 14X74 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 360 A is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2064.8 cm³ against 2090 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.2%. They weigh essentially the same, 110.1 kg/m and 112 kg/m. W 14X74 is deeper, 360.7 mm against 350 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 14X74
W
HE 360 A
HE
Difference
Mass110.1 kg/m112 kg/m-1.7%
Depth360.7 mm350 mm+3.1%
Width256.5 mm300 mm-14.5%
Web thickness11.4 mm10 mm+14.0%
Flange thickness19.9 mm17.5 mm+13.7%
Area140.6 cm²143 cm²-1.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)33,090 cm⁴33,100 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,064.8 cm³2,090 cm³-1.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,835.4 cm³1,890 cm³-2.9%
Second moment, minor (Iz)5,578 cm⁴7,890 cm⁴-29.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)663.68 cm³802 cm³-17.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.3 cm7.43 cm-15.2%
Torsion constant (It)161.1 cm⁴153 cm⁴+5.3%

W 14X74 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 360 A to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 360 A.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 360 A has the larger second moment of area: 33,100 cm⁴ against 33,090 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (18.8 against 18.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: HE 360 A has 802 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 663.68 cm³, 17.2% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 14X74 has a plastic modulus of 2064.8 cm³ and HE 360 A has 2090 cm³, a difference of only 1.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 14X74 is 110.1 kg/m and HE 360 A is 112 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 360 A gives 2090 cm³ of plastic modulus and 33,100 cm⁴ of inertia against 2064.8 cm³ and 33,090 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 360 A, with a second moment of area of 33,100 cm⁴ against 33,090 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 14X74 vs H-350x350x10x16-113HE 360 A vs H-350x350x10x16-113
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…