CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

HE 360 A vs H-350x350x10x16-113

HE 360 A is an HE section from the European (Continental) range; H-350x350x10x16-113 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2090 cm³ against 2092 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 112 kg/m and 113 kg/m. Both are about 347 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyHE 360 A
HE
H-350x350x10x16-113
MB & MC
Difference
Mass112 kg/m113 kg/m-0.9%
Depth350 mm344 mm+1.7%
Width300 mm348 mm-13.8%
Web thickness10 mm10 mmsame
Flange thickness17.5 mm16 mm+9.4%
Area143 cm²144 cm²-0.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)33,100 cm⁴32,850 cm⁴+0.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,090 cm³2,092 cm³-0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,890 cm³1,910 cm³-1.0%
Second moment, minor (Iz)7,890 cm⁴11,240 cm⁴-29.8%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)802 cm³978 cm³-18.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.43 cm8.84 cm-16.0%
Torsion constant (It)153 cm⁴111 cm⁴+37.8%

HE 360 A to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; H-350x350x10x16-113 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-350x350x10x16-113.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 360 A has the larger second moment of area: 33,100 cm⁴ against 32,850 cm⁴, a difference of 0.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (18.7 against 18.5 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-350x350x10x16-113 has 978 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 802 cm³, 18.0% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. HE 360 A has a plastic modulus of 2090 cm³ and H-350x350x10x16-113 has 2092 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: HE 360 A is 112 kg/m and H-350x350x10x16-113 is 113 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-350x350x10x16-113 gives 2092 cm³ of plastic modulus and 32,850 cm⁴ of inertia against 2090 cm³ and 33,100 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

HE 360 A, with a second moment of area of 33,100 cm⁴ against 32,850 cm⁴ (0.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 14X74 vs HE 360 AW 14X74 vs H-350x350x10x16-113
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…