CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 16X50 vs H-400x200x9x15

W 16X50 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-400x200x9x15 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1507.6 cm³ against 1528 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.3%. They weigh essentially the same, 74.4 kg/m and 75.5 kg/m. W 16X50 is deeper, 414 mm against 404 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 16X50
W
H-400x200x9x15
MB & MC
Difference
Mass74.4 kg/m75.5 kg/m-1.5%
Depth414 mm404 mm+2.5%
Width179.6 mm201 mm-10.6%
Web thickness9.7 mm9 mm+7.8%
Flange thickness16 mm15 mm+6.7%
Area94.8 cm²96.2 cm²-1.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)27,430 cm⁴27,490 cm⁴-0.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,507.6 cm³1,528 cm³-1.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,327.4 cm³1,361 cm³-2.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,548 cm⁴2,035 cm⁴-23.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)267.11 cm³312 cm³-14.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.04 cm4.6 cm-12.2%
Torsion constant (It)63.27 cm⁴62.3 cm⁴+1.6%

W 16X50 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-400x200x9x15 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-400x200x9x15.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-400x200x9x15 has the larger second moment of area: 27,490 cm⁴ against 27,430 cm⁴, a difference of 0.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (20.3 against 20.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-400x200x9x15 has 312 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 267.11 cm³, 14.4% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 16X50 has a plastic modulus of 1507.6 cm³ and H-400x200x9x15 has 1528 cm³, a difference of only 1.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 16X50 is 74.4 kg/m and H-400x200x9x15 is 75.5 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-400x200x9x15 gives 1528 cm³ of plastic modulus and 27,490 cm⁴ of inertia against 1507.6 cm³ and 27,430 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-400x200x9x15, with a second moment of area of 27,490 cm⁴ against 27,430 cm⁴ (0.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 406×178×74 vs W 16X50UB 406×178×74 vs H-400x200x9x15W 16X50 vs IPE O 400
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…