CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 16X50 vs IPE O 400

W 16X50 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; IPE O 400 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1507.6 cm³ against 1500 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.5%. They weigh essentially the same, 74.4 kg/m and 75.7 kg/m. W 16X50 is deeper, 414 mm against 404 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 16X50
W
IPE O 400
IPE
Difference
Mass74.4 kg/m75.7 kg/m-1.7%
Depth414 mm404 mm+2.5%
Width179.6 mm182 mm-1.3%
Web thickness9.7 mm9.7 mmsame
Flange thickness16 mm15.5 mm+3.2%
Area94.8 cm²96.4 cm²-1.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)27,430 cm⁴26,800 cm⁴+2.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,507.6 cm³1,500 cm³+0.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,327.4 cm³1,320 cm³+0.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,548 cm⁴1,560 cm⁴-0.8%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)267.11 cm³269 cm³-0.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.04 cm4.03 cm+0.2%
Torsion constant (It)63.27 cm⁴73.3 cm⁴-13.7%

W 16X50 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; IPE O 400 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE O 400.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 16X50 has the larger second moment of area: 27,430 cm⁴ against 26,800 cm⁴, a difference of 2.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 16X50 is the more efficient section: 20.3 against 19.8 cm³ per kg/m, 2.3% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 16X50 has a plastic modulus of 1507.6 cm³ and IPE O 400 has 1500 cm³, a difference of only 0.5% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 16X50 is 74.4 kg/m and IPE O 400 is 75.7 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE O 400 gives 1500 cm³ of plastic modulus and 26,800 cm⁴ of inertia against 1507.6 cm³ and 27,430 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 16X50, with a second moment of area of 27,430 cm⁴ against 26,800 cm⁴ (2.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 406×178×74 vs IPE O 400UB 406×178×74 vs W 16X50W 16X50 vs H-400x200x9x15
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…