CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 406×178×74 vs IPE O 400

UB 406×178×74 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); IPE O 400 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1500 cm³ against 1500 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 74.2 kg/m and 75.7 kg/m. UB 406×178×74 is deeper, 412.8 mm against 404 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 406×178×74
UB
IPE O 400
IPE
Difference
Mass74.2 kg/m75.7 kg/m-2.0%
Depth412.8 mm404 mm+2.2%
Width179.5 mm182 mm-1.4%
Web thickness9.5 mm9.7 mm-2.1%
Flange thickness16 mm15.5 mm+3.2%
Area94.5 cm²96.4 cm²-2.0%
Second moment, major (Iy)27,300 cm⁴26,800 cm⁴+1.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,500 cm³1,500 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,320 cm³1,320 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,550 cm⁴1,560 cm⁴-0.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)267 cm³269 cm³-0.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.04 cm4.03 cm+0.2%
Torsion constant (It)62.8 cm⁴73.3 cm⁴-14.3%

UB 406×178×74 to BS EN 10365:2017; IPE O 400 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE O 400.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 406×178×74 has the larger second moment of area: 27,300 cm⁴ against 26,800 cm⁴, a difference of 1.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UB 406×178×74 is the more efficient section: 20.2 against 19.8 cm³ per kg/m, 2.0% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 406×178×74 has a plastic modulus of 1500 cm³ and IPE O 400 has 1500 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 406×178×74 is 74.2 kg/m and IPE O 400 is 75.7 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE O 400 gives 1500 cm³ of plastic modulus and 26,800 cm⁴ of inertia against 1500 cm³ and 27,300 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 406×178×74, with a second moment of area of 27,300 cm⁴ against 26,800 cm⁴ (1.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 406×178×74 vs W 16X50UB 406×178×74 vs H-400x200x9x15W 16X50 vs IPE O 400
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…