CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 18X50 vs H-450x200x9x14-74.9

W 18X50 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-450x200x9x14-74.9 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1655.1 cm³ against 1652 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.2%. They weigh essentially the same, 74.4 kg/m and 74.9 kg/m. Both are about 454 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 18X50
W
H-450x200x9x14-74.9
MB & MC
Difference
Mass74.4 kg/m74.9 kg/m-0.7%
Depth457.2 mm450 mm+1.6%
Width190.5 mm200 mm-4.8%
Web thickness9 mm9 mmsame
Flange thickness14.5 mm14 mm+3.6%
Area94.8 cm²95.4 cm²-0.6%
Second moment, major (Iy)33,299 cm⁴32,890 cm⁴+1.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,655.1 cm³1,652 cm³+0.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,456.8 cm³1,462 cm³-0.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,669 cm⁴1,870 cm⁴-10.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)272.03 cm³290 cm³-6.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.19 cm4.43 cm-5.4%
Torsion constant (It)51.61 cm⁴51.6 cm⁴same

W 18X50 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-450x200x9x14-74.9 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-450x200x9x14-74.9.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 18X50 has the larger second moment of area: 33,299 cm⁴ against 32,890 cm⁴, a difference of 1.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (22.2 against 22.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 18X50 has a plastic modulus of 1655.1 cm³ and H-450x200x9x14-74.9 has 1652 cm³, a difference of only 0.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 18X50 is 74.4 kg/m and H-450x200x9x14-74.9 is 74.9 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-450x200x9x14-74.9 gives 1652 cm³ of plastic modulus and 32,890 cm⁴ of inertia against 1655.1 cm³ and 33,299 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 18X50, with a second moment of area of 33,299 cm⁴ against 32,890 cm⁴ (1.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 450 vs W 18X50UB 457×191×74 vs W 18X50UB 457×191×74 vs H-450x200x9x14-74.9UB 457×152×74 vs W 18X50UB 457×152×74 vs H-450x200x9x14-74.9W 18X50 vs S 18X54.7
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…