CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 457×191×74 vs H-450x200x9x14-74.9

UB 457×191×74 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-450x200x9x14-74.9 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1650 cm³ against 1652 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 74.3 kg/m and 74.9 kg/m. Both are about 454 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 457×191×74
UB
H-450x200x9x14-74.9
MB & MC
Difference
Mass74.3 kg/m74.9 kg/m-0.8%
Depth457 mm450 mm+1.6%
Width190.4 mm200 mm-4.8%
Web thickness9 mm9 mmsame
Flange thickness14.5 mm14 mm+3.6%
Area94.6 cm²95.4 cm²-0.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)33,300 cm⁴32,890 cm⁴+1.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,650 cm³1,652 cm³-0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,460 cm³1,462 cm³-0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,670 cm⁴1,870 cm⁴-10.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)272 cm³290 cm³-6.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.2 cm4.43 cm-5.2%
Torsion constant (It)51.8 cm⁴51.6 cm⁴+0.4%

UB 457×191×74 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-450x200x9x14-74.9 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-450x200x9x14-74.9.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 457×191×74 has the larger second moment of area: 33,300 cm⁴ against 32,890 cm⁴, a difference of 1.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (22.2 against 22.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 457×191×74 has a plastic modulus of 1650 cm³ and H-450x200x9x14-74.9 has 1652 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 457×191×74 is 74.3 kg/m and H-450x200x9x14-74.9 is 74.9 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-450x200x9x14-74.9 gives 1652 cm³ of plastic modulus and 32,890 cm⁴ of inertia against 1650 cm³ and 33,300 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 457×191×74, with a second moment of area of 33,300 cm⁴ against 32,890 cm⁴ (1.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 450 vs UB 457×191×74UB 457×191×74 vs W 18X50UB 457×191×74 vs S 18X54.7UB 457×152×74 vs H-450x200x9x14-74.9W 18X50 vs H-450x200x9x14-74.9
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…