CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

IPE 450 vs UB 457×191×74

IPE 450 is an IPE section from the European (Continental) range; UB 457×191×74 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). IPE 450 carries more bending: 1700 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1650 cm³, 3.0% more. UB 457×191×74 is the lighter of the two at 74.3 kg/m against 77.6 kg/m, a saving of 4.4% on steel weight. Both are about 454 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyIPE 450
IPE
UB 457×191×74
UB
Difference
Mass77.6 kg/m74.3 kg/m+4.4%
Depth450 mm457 mm-1.5%
Width190 mm190.4 mm-0.2%
Web thickness9.4 mm9 mm+4.4%
Flange thickness14.6 mm14.5 mm+0.7%
Area98.8 cm²94.6 cm²+4.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)33,700 cm⁴33,300 cm⁴+1.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,700 cm³1,650 cm³+3.0%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,500 cm³1,460 cm³+2.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,680 cm⁴1,670 cm⁴+0.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)276 cm³272 cm³+1.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.12 cm4.2 cm-1.9%
Torsion constant (It)66.7 cm⁴51.8 cm⁴+28.8%

IPE 450 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; UB 457×191×74 to BS EN 10365:2017. Difference is expressed relative to UB 457×191×74.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, IPE 450 has the larger second moment of area: 33,700 cm⁴ against 33,300 cm⁴, a difference of 1.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (21.9 against 22.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. IPE sections are specified to EN 10365 · Continental Steel and UB to BS EN 10365:2017; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.4% weight.

In short, IPE 450 is the stronger section and UB 457×191×74 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

IPE 450 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 1700 cm³ against 1650 cm³ - 3.0% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

UB 457×191×74 at 74.3 kg/m, against 77.6 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.4%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: UB 457×191×74 gives 1650 cm³ of plastic modulus and 33,300 cm⁴ of inertia against 1700 cm³ and 33,700 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (EN 10365 · Continental Steel and BS EN 10365:2017), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

IPE 450, with a second moment of area of 33,700 cm⁴ against 33,300 cm⁴ (1.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 450 vs W 18X50IPE 450 vs S 18X54.7IPE 450 vs H-450x200x9x14-76UB 457×191×74 vs W 18X50UB 457×191×74 vs S 18X54.7UB 457×191×74 vs H-450x200x9x14-74.9UB 457×152×74 vs IPE 450
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…