CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 18X60 vs IPE O 450

W 18X60 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; IPE O 450 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2015.6 cm³ against 2050 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.7%. W 18X60 is the lighter of the two at 89.3 kg/m against 92.4 kg/m, a saving of 3.4% on steel weight. Both are about 459 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 18X60
W
IPE O 450
IPE
Difference
Mass89.3 kg/m92.4 kg/m-3.4%
Depth462.3 mm456 mm+1.4%
Width192 mm192 mmsame
Web thickness10.5 mm11 mm-4.5%
Flange thickness17.7 mm17.6 mm+0.6%
Area113.5 cm²118 cm²-3.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)40,957 cm⁴40,900 cm⁴+0.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,015.6 cm³2,050 cm³-1.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,769.8 cm³1,800 cm³-1.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,085 cm⁴2,080 cm⁴+0.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)337.57 cm³341 cm³-1.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.27 cm4.21 cm+1.4%
Torsion constant (It)90.32 cm⁴109 cm⁴-17.1%

W 18X60 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; IPE O 450 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE O 450.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 18X60 has the larger second moment of area: 40,957 cm⁴ against 40,900 cm⁴, a difference of 0.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (22.6 against 22.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 3.4% weight.

In short, IPE O 450 is the stronger section and W 18X60 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 18X60 has a plastic modulus of 2015.6 cm³ and IPE O 450 has 2050 cm³, a difference of only 1.7% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 18X60 at 89.3 kg/m, against 92.4 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.4%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE O 450 gives 2050 cm³ of plastic modulus and 40,900 cm⁴ of inertia against 2015.6 cm³ and 40,957 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 18X60, with a second moment of area of 40,957 cm⁴ against 40,900 cm⁴ (0.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 457×191×89 vs IPE O 450UB 457×191×89 vs W 18X60W 18X60 vs S 18X70W 18X60 vs H-450x200x10x17
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…