CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 18X60 vs H-450x200x10x17

W 18X60 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-450x200x10x17 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2015.6 cm³ against 2003 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.6%. They weigh essentially the same, 89.3 kg/m and 88.9 kg/m. Both are about 459 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 18X60
W
H-450x200x10x17
MB & MC
Difference
Mass89.3 kg/m88.9 kg/m+0.4%
Depth462.3 mm456 mm+1.4%
Width192 mm201 mm-4.5%
Web thickness10.5 mm10 mm+5.0%
Flange thickness17.7 mm17 mm+4.1%
Area113.5 cm²113 cm²+0.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)40,957 cm⁴40,400 cm⁴+1.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,015.6 cm³2,003 cm³+0.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,769.8 cm³1,772 cm³-0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,085 cm⁴2,308 cm⁴-9.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)337.57 cm³356 cm³-5.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.27 cm4.51 cm-5.3%
Torsion constant (It)90.32 cm⁴92.5 cm⁴-2.4%

W 18X60 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-450x200x10x17 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-450x200x10x17.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 18X60 has the larger second moment of area: 40,957 cm⁴ against 40,400 cm⁴, a difference of 1.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (22.6 against 22.5 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 18X60 has a plastic modulus of 2015.6 cm³ and H-450x200x10x17 has 2003 cm³, a difference of only 0.6% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 18X60 is 89.3 kg/m and H-450x200x10x17 is 88.9 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-450x200x10x17 gives 2003 cm³ of plastic modulus and 40,400 cm⁴ of inertia against 2015.6 cm³ and 40,957 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 18X60, with a second moment of area of 40,957 cm⁴ against 40,400 cm⁴ (1.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 457×191×89 vs W 18X60UB 457×191×89 vs H-450x200x10x17W 18X60 vs IPE O 450W 18X60 vs S 18X70
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…