CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 18X65 vs HE 450 AA

W 18X65 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 450 AA is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2179.5 cm³ against 2180 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. W 18X65 is the lighter of the two at 96.7 kg/m against 99.7 kg/m, a saving of 3.0% on steel weight. W 18X65 is deeper, 467.4 mm against 425 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 18X65
W
HE 450 AA
HE
Difference
Mass96.7 kg/m99.7 kg/m-3.0%
Depth467.4 mm425 mm+10.0%
Width192.8 mm300 mm-35.7%
Web thickness11.4 mm10 mm+14.0%
Flange thickness19 mm13.5 mm+40.7%
Area123.2 cm²127 cm²-3.0%
Second moment, major (Iy)44,537 cm⁴41,900 cm⁴+6.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,179.5 cm³2,180 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,917.3 cm³1,970 cm³-2.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,281 cm⁴6,090 cm⁴-62.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)368.71 cm³624 cm³-40.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.29 cm6.92 cm-38.0%
Torsion constant (It)113.6 cm⁴91.4 cm⁴+24.3%

W 18X65 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 450 AA to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 450 AA.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 18X65 has the larger second moment of area: 44,537 cm⁴ against 41,900 cm⁴, a difference of 6.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 18X65 is the more efficient section: 22.5 against 21.9 cm³ per kg/m, 3.1% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: HE 450 AA has 624 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 368.71 cm³, 40.9% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 3.0% weight.

In short, HE 450 AA is the stronger section and W 18X65 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 18X65 has a plastic modulus of 2179.5 cm³ and HE 450 AA has 2180 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 18X65 at 96.7 kg/m, against 99.7 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.0%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 450 AA gives 2180 cm³ of plastic modulus and 41,900 cm⁴ of inertia against 2179.5 cm³ and 44,537 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 18X65, with a second moment of area of 44,537 cm⁴ against 41,900 cm⁴ (6.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 500 vs W 18X65UB 457×191×98 vs W 18X65W 18X65 vs H-450x200x11x19W 16X67 vs HE 450 AA
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…