CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 457×191×98 vs W 18X65

UB 457×191×98 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 18X65 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. UB 457×191×98 carries more bending: 2230 cm³ of plastic modulus against 2179.5 cm³, 2.3% more. They weigh essentially the same, 98.3 kg/m and 96.7 kg/m. Both are about 467 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 457×191×98
UB
W 18X65
W
Difference
Mass98.3 kg/m96.7 kg/m+1.7%
Depth467.2 mm467.4 mmsame
Width192.8 mm192.8 mmsame
Web thickness11.4 mm11.4 mmsame
Flange thickness19.6 mm19 mm+3.2%
Area125 cm²123.2 cm²+1.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)45,700 cm⁴44,537 cm⁴+2.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,230 cm³2,179.5 cm³+2.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,960 cm³1,917.3 cm³+2.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,350 cm⁴2,281 cm⁴+3.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)379 cm³368.71 cm³+2.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.33 cm4.29 cm+0.9%
Torsion constant (It)121 cm⁴113.6 cm⁴+6.5%

UB 457×191×98 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 18X65 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 18X65.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 457×191×98 has the larger second moment of area: 45,700 cm⁴ against 44,537 cm⁴, a difference of 2.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (22.7 against 22.5 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, UB 457×191×98 is the stronger section and W 18X65 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

UB 457×191×98 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 2230 cm³ against 2179.5 cm³ - 2.3% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: UB 457×191×98 is 98.3 kg/m and W 18X65 is 96.7 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 18X65 gives 2179.5 cm³ of plastic modulus and 44,537 cm⁴ of inertia against 2230 cm³ and 45,700 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 457×191×98, with a second moment of area of 45,700 cm⁴ against 44,537 cm⁴ (2.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 500 vs UB 457×191×98IPE 500 vs W 18X65UB 457×191×98 vs IPE V 450UB 457×191×98 vs H-450x200x11x19W 18X65 vs HE 450 AAW 18X65 vs H-450x200x11x19
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…