CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 457×191×98 vs IPE V 450

UB 457×191×98 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); IPE V 450 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. IPE V 450 carries more bending: 2300 cm³ of plastic modulus against 2230 cm³, 3.0% more. UB 457×191×98 is the lighter of the two at 98.3 kg/m against 107 kg/m, a saving of 8.1% on steel weight. Both are about 464 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 457×191×98
UB
IPE V 450
IPE
Difference
Mass98.3 kg/m107 kg/m-8.1%
Depth467.2 mm460 mm+1.6%
Width192.8 mm194 mm-0.6%
Web thickness11.4 mm12.4 mm-8.1%
Flange thickness19.6 mm19.6 mmsame
Area125 cm²132 cm²-5.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)45,700 cm⁴46,200 cm⁴-1.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,230 cm³2,300 cm³-3.0%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,960 cm³2,010 cm³-2.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,350 cm⁴2,400 cm⁴-2.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)379 cm³389 cm³-2.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.33 cm4.26 cm+1.6%
Torsion constant (It)121 cm⁴149 cm⁴-18.8%

UB 457×191×98 to BS EN 10365:2017; IPE V 450 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE V 450.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, IPE V 450 has the larger second moment of area: 46,200 cm⁴ against 45,700 cm⁴, a difference of 1.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UB 457×191×98 is the more efficient section: 22.7 against 21.5 cm³ per kg/m, 5.5% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 8.1% weight.

In short, IPE V 450 is the stronger section and UB 457×191×98 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

IPE V 450 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 2300 cm³ against 2230 cm³ - 3.0% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

UB 457×191×98 at 98.3 kg/m, against 107 kg/m for the other - a saving of 8.1%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE V 450 gives 2300 cm³ of plastic modulus and 46,200 cm⁴ of inertia against 2230 cm³ and 45,700 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

IPE V 450, with a second moment of area of 46,200 cm⁴ against 45,700 cm⁴ (1.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 500 vs UB 457×191×98UB 457×191×106 vs IPE V 450UB 457×191×98 vs W 18X65UB 457×191×98 vs H-450x200x11x19W 18X71 vs IPE V 450
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…