CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 18X86 vs H-500x300x11x18-125

W 18X86 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-500x300x11x18-125 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. H-500x300x11x18-125 carries more bending: 3132 cm³ of plastic modulus against 3048 cm³, 2.7% more. H-500x300x11x18-125 is the lighter of the two at 125 kg/m against 128 kg/m, a saving of 2.4% on steel weight. H-500x300x11x18-125 is deeper, 488 mm against 467.4 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 18X86
W
H-500x300x11x18-125
MB & MC
Difference
Mass128 kg/m125 kg/m+2.4%
Depth467.4 mm488 mm-4.2%
Width281.9 mm300 mm-6.0%
Web thickness12.2 mm11 mm+10.9%
Flange thickness19.6 mm18 mm+8.9%
Area163.2 cm²159 cm²+2.6%
Second moment, major (Iy)63,683 cm⁴68,860 cm⁴-7.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,048 cm³3,132 cm³-2.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,720.3 cm³2,822 cm³-3.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)7,284 cm⁴8,106 cm⁴-10.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)793.13 cm³825 cm³-3.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.68 cm7.14 cm-6.4%
Torsion constant (It)170.7 cm⁴143 cm⁴+19.4%

W 18X86 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-500x300x11x18-125 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-500x300x11x18-125.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-500x300x11x18-125 has the larger second moment of area: 68,860 cm⁴ against 63,683 cm⁴, a difference of 7.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, H-500x300x11x18-125 is the more efficient section: 25.1 against 23.8 cm³ per kg/m, 5.0% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.4% weight.

In short, H-500x300x11x18-125 is the stronger section and H-500x300x11x18-125 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

H-500x300x11x18-125 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 3132 cm³ against 3048 cm³ - 2.7% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

H-500x300x11x18-125 at 125 kg/m, against 128 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.4%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-500x300x11x18-125 gives 3132 cm³ of plastic modulus and 68,860 cm⁴ of inertia against 3048 cm³ and 63,683 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-500x300x11x18-125, with a second moment of area of 68,860 cm⁴ against 63,683 cm⁴ (7.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 457×191×133 vs W 18X86UB 457×191×133 vs H-500x300x11x18-125
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…