CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 457×191×133 vs W 18X86

UB 457×191×133 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 18X86 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 3070 cm³ against 3048 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.7%. W 18X86 is the lighter of the two at 128 kg/m against 133.3 kg/m, a saving of 4.1% on steel weight. UB 457×191×133 is deeper, 480.6 mm against 467.4 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 457×191×133
UB
W 18X86
W
Difference
Mass133.3 kg/m128 kg/m+4.1%
Depth480.6 mm467.4 mm+2.8%
Width196.7 mm281.9 mm-30.2%
Web thickness15.3 mm12.2 mm+25.4%
Flange thickness26.3 mm19.6 mm+34.2%
Area170 cm²163.2 cm²+4.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)63,800 cm⁴63,683 cm⁴+0.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,070 cm³3,048 cm³+0.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,660 cm³2,720.3 cm³-2.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)3,350 cm⁴7,284 cm⁴-54.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)535 cm³793.13 cm³-32.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.44 cm6.68 cm-33.5%
Torsion constant (It)292 cm⁴170.7 cm⁴+71.1%

UB 457×191×133 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 18X86 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 18X86.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 457×191×133 has the larger second moment of area: 63,800 cm⁴ against 63,683 cm⁴, a difference of 0.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 18X86 is the more efficient section: 23.8 against 23.0 cm³ per kg/m, 3.3% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 18X86 has 793.13 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 535 cm³, 32.5% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.1% weight.

In short, UB 457×191×133 is the stronger section and W 18X86 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 457×191×133 has a plastic modulus of 3070 cm³ and W 18X86 has 3048 cm³, a difference of only 0.7% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 18X86 at 128 kg/m, against 133.3 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.1%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 18X86 gives 3048 cm³ of plastic modulus and 63,683 cm⁴ of inertia against 3070 cm³ and 63,800 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 457×191×133, with a second moment of area of 63,800 cm⁴ against 63,683 cm⁴ (0.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 457×191×133 vs H-500x300x11x18-125W 18X86 vs H-500x300x11x18-125
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…