CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 21X182 vs HE 550 M

W 21X182 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 550 M is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 7800.2 cm³ against 7930 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.6%. W 21X182 is the lighter of the two at 270.8 kg/m against 278 kg/m, a saving of 2.6% on steel weight. Both are about 574 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 21X182
W
HE 550 M
HE
Difference
Mass270.8 kg/m278 kg/m-2.6%
Depth576.6 mm572 mm+0.8%
Width317.5 mm306 mm+3.8%
Web thickness21.1 mm21 mm+0.5%
Flange thickness37.6 mm40 mm-6.0%
Area345.8 cm²354 cm²-2.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)196,877 cm⁴198,000 cm⁴-0.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)7,800.2 cm³7,930 cm³-1.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)6,833.4 cm³6,920 cm³-1.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)20,104 cm⁴19,200 cm⁴+4.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,950.1 cm³1,940 cm³+0.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.62 cm7.35 cm+3.7%
Torsion constant (It)1,278 cm⁴1,560 cm⁴-18.1%

W 21X182 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 550 M to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 550 M.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 550 M has the larger second moment of area: 198,000 cm⁴ against 196,877 cm⁴, a difference of 0.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (28.8 against 28.5 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.6% weight.

In short, HE 550 M is the stronger section and W 21X182 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 21X182 has a plastic modulus of 7800.2 cm³ and HE 550 M has 7930 cm³, a difference of only 1.6% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 21X182 at 270.8 kg/m, against 278 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.6%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 550 M gives 7930 cm³ of plastic modulus and 198,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 7800.2 cm³ and 196,877 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 550 M, with a second moment of area of 198,000 cm⁴ against 196,877 cm⁴ (0.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 533×312×273 vs HE 550 MUB 533×312×273 vs W 21X182
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…