CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 533×312×273 vs W 21X182

UB 533×312×273 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 21X182 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 7870 cm³ against 7800.2 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.9%. They weigh essentially the same, 273.3 kg/m and 270.8 kg/m. Both are about 577 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 533×312×273
UB
W 21X182
W
Difference
Mass273.3 kg/m270.8 kg/m+0.9%
Depth577.1 mm576.6 mm+0.1%
Width320.2 mm317.5 mm+0.9%
Web thickness21.1 mm21.1 mmsame
Flange thickness37.6 mm37.6 mmsame
Area348 cm²345.8 cm²+0.6%
Second moment, major (Iy)199,000 cm⁴196,877 cm⁴+1.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)7,870 cm³7,800.2 cm³+0.9%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)6,890 cm³6,833.4 cm³+0.8%
Second moment, minor (Iz)20,600 cm⁴20,104 cm⁴+2.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,990 cm³1,950.1 cm³+2.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.69 cm7.62 cm+0.9%
Torsion constant (It)1,290 cm⁴1,278 cm⁴+0.9%

UB 533×312×273 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 21X182 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 21X182.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 533×312×273 has the larger second moment of area: 199,000 cm⁴ against 196,877 cm⁴, a difference of 1.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (28.8 against 28.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 533×312×273 has a plastic modulus of 7870 cm³ and W 21X182 has 7800.2 cm³, a difference of only 0.9% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 533×312×273 is 273.3 kg/m and W 21X182 is 270.8 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 21X182 gives 7800.2 cm³ of plastic modulus and 196,877 cm⁴ of inertia against 7870 cm³ and 199,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 533×312×273, with a second moment of area of 199,000 cm⁴ against 196,877 cm⁴ (1.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 533×312×273 vs HE 550 MW 21X182 vs HE 550 M
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…