CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 21X275 vs HE 600 x 399

W 21X275 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 600 x 399 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 12273.9 cm³ against 12500 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.8%. HE 600 x 399 is the lighter of the two at 399 kg/m against 409.2 kg/m, a saving of 2.6% on steel weight. HE 600 x 399 is deeper, 648 mm against 612.1 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 21X275
W
HE 600 x 399
HE
Difference
Mass409.2 kg/m399 kg/m+2.6%
Depth612.1 mm648 mm-5.5%
Width327.7 mm315 mm+4.0%
Web thickness31 mm30 mm+3.3%
Flange thickness55.6 mm54 mm+3.0%
Area527.7 cm²508 cm²+3.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)320,082 cm⁴345,000 cm⁴-7.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)12,273.9 cm³12,500 cm³-1.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)10,454.9 cm³10,600 cm³-1.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)32,757 cm⁴28,300 cm⁴+15.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)3,129.9 cm³2,810 cm³+11.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.87 cm7.46 cm+5.5%
Torsion constant (It)4,454 cm⁴3,930 cm⁴+13.3%

W 21X275 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 600 x 399 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 600 x 399.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 600 x 399 has the larger second moment of area: 345,000 cm⁴ against 320,082 cm⁴, a difference of 7.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, HE 600 x 399 is the more efficient section: 31.3 against 30.0 cm³ per kg/m, 4.3% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 21X275 has 3129.9 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 2810 cm³, 11.4% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.6% weight.

In short, HE 600 x 399 is the stronger section and HE 600 x 399 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 21X275 has a plastic modulus of 12273.9 cm³ and HE 600 x 399 has 12500 cm³, a difference of only 1.8% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

HE 600 x 399 at 399 kg/m, against 409.2 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.6%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 600 x 399 gives 12500 cm³ of plastic modulus and 345,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 12273.9 cm³ and 320,082 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 600 x 399, with a second moment of area of 345,000 cm⁴ against 320,082 cm⁴ (7.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 24X250 vs HE 600 x 399
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…