CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 21X48 vs UB 533×165×75

W 21X48 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; UB 533×165×75 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). UB 533×165×75 carries more bending: 1810 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1753.4 cm³, 3.1% more. W 21X48 is the lighter of the two at 71.4 kg/m against 74.7 kg/m, a saving of 4.4% on steel weight. Both are about 526 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 21X48
W
UB 533×165×75
UB
Difference
Mass71.4 kg/m74.7 kg/m-4.4%
Depth523.2 mm529.1 mm-1.1%
Width206.8 mm165.9 mm+24.7%
Web thickness8.9 mm9.7 mm-8.2%
Flange thickness10.9 mm13.6 mm-19.9%
Area91 cm²95.2 cm²-4.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)39,917 cm⁴41,100 cm⁴-2.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,753.4 cm³1,810 cm³-3.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,524 cm³1,550 cm³-1.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,611 cm⁴1,040 cm⁴+54.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)244.17 cm³200 cm³+22.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.22 cm3.3 cm+27.9%
Torsion constant (It)33.42 cm⁴47.9 cm⁴-30.2%

W 21X48 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; UB 533×165×75 to BS EN 10365:2017. Difference is expressed relative to UB 533×165×75.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 533×165×75 has the larger second moment of area: 41,100 cm⁴ against 39,917 cm⁴, a difference of 2.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (24.6 against 24.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 21X48 has 244.17 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 200 cm³, 22.1% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and UB to BS EN 10365:2017; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.4% weight.

In short, UB 533×165×75 is the stronger section and W 21X48 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

UB 533×165×75 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 1810 cm³ against 1753.4 cm³ - 3.1% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

W 21X48 at 71.4 kg/m, against 74.7 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.4%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: UB 533×165×75 gives 1810 cm³ of plastic modulus and 41,100 cm⁴ of inertia against 1753.4 cm³ and 39,917 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and BS EN 10365:2017), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 533×165×75, with a second moment of area of 41,100 cm⁴ against 39,917 cm⁴ (2.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 533×165×75 vs W 21X50
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…