CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 24X117 vs H-600x300x14x23-175

W 24X117 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-600x300x14x23-175 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. W 24X117 carries more bending: 5358.6 cm³ of plastic modulus against 5197 cm³, 3.1% more. They weigh essentially the same, 174.1 kg/m and 175 kg/m. W 24X117 is deeper, 617.2 mm against 594 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 24X117
W
H-600x300x14x23-175
MB & MC
Difference
Mass174.1 kg/m175 kg/m-0.5%
Depth617.2 mm594 mm+3.9%
Width325.1 mm302 mm+7.6%
Web thickness14 mm14 mmsame
Flange thickness21.6 mm23 mm-6.1%
Area221.9 cm²222 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)147,346 cm⁴137,300 cm⁴+7.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)5,358.6 cm³5,197 cm³+3.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)4,768.6 cm³4,624 cm³+3.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)12,362 cm⁴10,590 cm⁴+16.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,170 cm³1,085 cm³+7.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.47 cm6.9 cm+8.3%
Torsion constant (It)279.7 cm⁴356 cm⁴-21.4%

W 24X117 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-600x300x14x23-175 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-600x300x14x23-175.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 24X117 has the larger second moment of area: 147,346 cm⁴ against 137,300 cm⁴, a difference of 7.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 24X117 is the more efficient section: 30.8 against 29.7 cm³ per kg/m, 3.6% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, W 24X117 is the stronger section and W 24X117 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 24X117 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 5358.6 cm³ against 5197 cm³ - 3.1% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: W 24X117 is 174.1 kg/m and H-600x300x14x23-175 is 175 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-600x300x14x23-175 gives 5197 cm³ of plastic modulus and 137,300 cm⁴ of inertia against 5358.6 cm³ and 147,346 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 24X117, with a second moment of area of 147,346 cm⁴ against 137,300 cm⁴ (7.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 610×305×179 vs W 24X117W 24X117 vs IPE V 600W 24X117 vs HE 600 AHE 600 A vs H-600x300x14x23-175
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…