CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 24X117 vs HE 600 A

W 24X117 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 600 A is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 5358.6 cm³ against 5350 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.2%. W 24X117 is the lighter of the two at 174.1 kg/m against 178 kg/m, a saving of 2.2% on steel weight. W 24X117 is deeper, 617.2 mm against 590 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 24X117
W
HE 600 A
HE
Difference
Mass174.1 kg/m178 kg/m-2.2%
Depth617.2 mm590 mm+4.6%
Width325.1 mm300 mm+8.4%
Web thickness14 mm13 mm+7.7%
Flange thickness21.6 mm25 mm-13.6%
Area221.9 cm²226 cm²-1.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)147,346 cm⁴141,000 cm⁴+4.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)5,358.6 cm³5,350 cm³+0.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)4,768.6 cm³4,790 cm³-0.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)12,362 cm⁴11,300 cm⁴+9.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,170 cm³1,160 cm³+0.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.47 cm7.05 cm+6.0%
Torsion constant (It)279.7 cm⁴407 cm⁴-31.3%

W 24X117 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 600 A to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 600 A.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 24X117 has the larger second moment of area: 147,346 cm⁴ against 141,000 cm⁴, a difference of 4.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 24X117 is the more efficient section: 30.8 against 30.1 cm³ per kg/m, 2.4% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.2% weight.

In short, W 24X117 is the stronger section and W 24X117 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 24X117 has a plastic modulus of 5358.6 cm³ and HE 600 A has 5350 cm³, a difference of only 0.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 24X117 at 174.1 kg/m, against 178 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.2%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 600 A gives 5350 cm³ of plastic modulus and 141,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 5358.6 cm³ and 147,346 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 24X117, with a second moment of area of 147,346 cm⁴ against 141,000 cm⁴ (4.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 610×305×179 vs W 24X117W 24X117 vs IPE V 600W 24X117 vs H-600x300x14x23-175HE 600 A vs IPE V 600HE 600 A vs H-600x300x14x23-175
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…