CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 24X229 vs HE 650 x 343

W 24X229 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 650 x 343 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. HE 650 x 343 carries more bending: 11400 cm³ of plastic modulus against 11061.3 cm³, 3.0% more. They weigh essentially the same, 340.8 kg/m and 343 kg/m. HE 650 x 343 is deeper, 680 mm against 660.4 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 24X229
W
HE 650 x 343
HE
Difference
Mass340.8 kg/m343 kg/m-0.6%
Depth660.4 mm680 mm-2.9%
Width332.7 mm309 mm+7.7%
Web thickness24.4 mm25 mm-2.4%
Flange thickness43.9 mm46 mm-4.6%
Area433.5 cm²438 cm²-1.0%
Second moment, major (Iy)318,417 cm⁴334,000 cm⁴-4.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)11,061.3 cm³11,400 cm³-3.0%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)9,635.6 cm³9,820 cm³-1.9%
Second moment, minor (Iz)27,097 cm⁴22,700 cm⁴+19.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,523.6 cm³2,300 cm³+9.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.9 cm7.21 cm+9.6%
Torsion constant (It)2,135 cm⁴2,440 cm⁴-12.5%

W 24X229 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 650 x 343 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 650 x 343.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 650 x 343 has the larger second moment of area: 334,000 cm⁴ against 318,417 cm⁴, a difference of 4.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, HE 650 x 343 is the more efficient section: 33.2 against 32.5 cm³ per kg/m, 2.3% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 24X229 has 2523.6 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 2300 cm³, 9.7% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, HE 650 x 343 is the stronger section and W 24X229 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

HE 650 x 343 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 11400 cm³ against 11061.3 cm³ - 3.0% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: W 24X229 is 340.8 kg/m and HE 650 x 343 is 343 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 650 x 343 gives 11400 cm³ of plastic modulus and 334,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 11061.3 cm³ and 318,417 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 650 x 343, with a second moment of area of 334,000 cm⁴ against 318,417 cm⁴ (4.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 27X217 vs HE 650 x 343
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…