CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 27X217 vs HE 650 x 343

W 27X217 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 650 x 343 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. W 27X217 carries more bending: 11651.2 cm³ of plastic modulus against 11400 cm³, 2.2% more. W 27X217 is the lighter of the two at 322.9 kg/m against 343 kg/m, a saving of 5.9% on steel weight. W 27X217 is deeper, 721.4 mm against 680 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 27X217
W
HE 650 x 343
HE
Difference
Mass322.9 kg/m343 kg/m-5.9%
Depth721.4 mm680 mm+6.1%
Width358.1 mm309 mm+15.9%
Web thickness21.1 mm25 mm-15.6%
Flange thickness38.1 mm46 mm-17.2%
Area412.3 cm²438 cm²-5.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)370,862 cm⁴334,000 cm⁴+11.0%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)11,651.2 cm³11,400 cm³+2.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)10,274.7 cm³9,820 cm³+4.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)29,303 cm⁴22,700 cm⁴+29.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,523.6 cm³2,300 cm³+9.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)8.43 cm7.21 cm+16.9%
Torsion constant (It)1,565 cm⁴2,440 cm⁴-35.9%

W 27X217 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 650 x 343 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 650 x 343.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 27X217 has the larger second moment of area: 370,862 cm⁴ against 334,000 cm⁴, a difference of 11.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 27X217 is the more efficient section: 36.1 against 33.2 cm³ per kg/m, 8.6% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 27X217 has 2523.6 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 2300 cm³, 9.7% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 5.9% weight.

In short, W 27X217 is the stronger section and W 27X217 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 27X217 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 11651.2 cm³ against 11400 cm³ - 2.2% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

W 27X217 at 322.9 kg/m, against 343 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.9%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 650 x 343 gives 11400 cm³ of plastic modulus and 334,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 11651.2 cm³ and 370,862 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 27X217, with a second moment of area of 370,862 cm⁴ against 334,000 cm⁴ (11.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 24X229 vs HE 650 x 343
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…