CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 27X161 vs HE 700 B

W 27X161 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 700 B is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 8439.3 cm³ against 8330 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.3%. They weigh essentially the same, 239.6 kg/m and 241 kg/m. Both are about 701 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 27X161
W
HE 700 B
HE
Difference
Mass239.6 kg/m241 kg/m-0.6%
Depth701 mm700 mm+0.1%
Width355.6 mm300 mm+18.5%
Web thickness16.8 mm17 mm-1.2%
Flange thickness27.4 mm32 mm-14.4%
Area307.1 cm²306 cm²+0.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)262,642 cm⁴257,000 cm⁴+2.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)8,439.3 cm³8,330 cm³+1.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)7,505.3 cm³7,340 cm³+2.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)20,687 cm⁴14,400 cm⁴+43.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,786.2 cm³1,500 cm³+19.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)8.2 cm6.87 cm+19.4%
Torsion constant (It)628.5 cm⁴839 cm⁴-25.1%

W 27X161 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 700 B to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 700 B.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 27X161 has the larger second moment of area: 262,642 cm⁴ against 257,000 cm⁴, a difference of 2.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (35.2 against 34.6 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 27X161 has 1786.2 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 1500 cm³, 19.1% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 27X161 has a plastic modulus of 8439.3 cm³ and HE 700 B has 8330 cm³, a difference of only 1.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 27X161 is 239.6 kg/m and HE 700 B is 241 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 700 B gives 8330 cm³ of plastic modulus and 257,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 8439.3 cm³ and 262,642 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 27X161, with a second moment of area of 262,642 cm⁴ against 257,000 cm⁴ (2.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 24X176 vs HE 700 B
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…