CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 30X148 vs H-800x300x14x26-210

W 30X148 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-800x300x14x26-210 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 8193.5 cm³ against 8243 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.6%. H-800x300x14x26-210 is the lighter of the two at 210 kg/m against 220.2 kg/m, a saving of 4.9% on steel weight. H-800x300x14x26-210 is deeper, 800 mm against 779.8 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 30X148
W
H-800x300x14x26-210
MB & MC
Difference
Mass220.2 kg/m210 kg/m+4.9%
Depth779.8 mm800 mm-2.5%
Width266.7 mm300 mm-11.1%
Web thickness16.5 mm14 mm+17.9%
Flange thickness30 mm26 mm+15.4%
Area281.3 cm²267 cm²+5.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)278,043 cm⁴291,700 cm⁴-4.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)8,193.5 cm³8,243 cm³-0.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)7,144.8 cm³7,292 cm³-2.0%
Second moment, minor (Iz)9,448 cm⁴11,740 cm⁴-19.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,114.3 cm³1,216 cm³-8.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.79 cm6.62 cm-12.5%
Torsion constant (It)603.5 cm⁴486 cm⁴+24.2%

W 30X148 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-800x300x14x26-210 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-800x300x14x26-210.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-800x300x14x26-210 has the larger second moment of area: 291,700 cm⁴ against 278,043 cm⁴, a difference of 4.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, H-800x300x14x26-210 is the more efficient section: 39.3 against 37.2 cm³ per kg/m, 5.2% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-800x300x14x26-210 has 1216 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 1114.3 cm³, 8.4% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.9% weight.

In short, H-800x300x14x26-210 is the stronger section and H-800x300x14x26-210 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 30X148 has a plastic modulus of 8193.5 cm³ and H-800x300x14x26-210 has 8243 cm³, a difference of only 0.6% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

H-800x300x14x26-210 at 210 kg/m, against 220.2 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.9%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-800x300x14x26-210 gives 8243 cm³ of plastic modulus and 291,700 cm⁴ of inertia against 8193.5 cm³ and 278,043 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-800x300x14x26-210, with a second moment of area of 291,700 cm⁴ against 278,043 cm⁴ (4.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 33X141 vs H-800x300x14x26-210W 30X148 vs IPE 750 x 220
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…