CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 33X141 vs H-800x300x14x26-210

W 33X141 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-800x300x14x26-210 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. W 33X141 carries more bending: 8423 cm³ of plastic modulus against 8243 cm³, 2.2% more. They weigh essentially the same, 209.8 kg/m and 210 kg/m. W 33X141 is deeper, 845.8 mm against 800 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 33X141
W
H-800x300x14x26-210
MB & MC
Difference
Mass209.8 kg/m210 kg/m-0.1%
Depth845.8 mm800 mm+5.7%
Width292.1 mm300 mm-2.6%
Web thickness15.4 mm14 mm+10.0%
Flange thickness24.4 mm26 mm-6.2%
Area267.7 cm²267 cm²+0.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)310,092 cm⁴291,700 cm⁴+6.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)8,423 cm³8,243 cm³+2.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)7,341.4 cm³7,292 cm³+0.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)10,239 cm⁴11,740 cm⁴-12.8%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,096.3 cm³1,216 cm³-9.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.17 cm6.62 cm-6.8%
Torsion constant (It)403.7 cm⁴486 cm⁴-16.9%

W 33X141 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-800x300x14x26-210 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-800x300x14x26-210.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 33X141 has the larger second moment of area: 310,092 cm⁴ against 291,700 cm⁴, a difference of 6.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 33X141 is the more efficient section: 40.1 against 39.3 cm³ per kg/m, 2.3% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-800x300x14x26-210 has 1216 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 1096.3 cm³, 9.8% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, W 33X141 is the stronger section and W 33X141 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 33X141 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 8423 cm³ against 8243 cm³ - 2.2% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: W 33X141 is 209.8 kg/m and H-800x300x14x26-210 is 210 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-800x300x14x26-210 gives 8243 cm³ of plastic modulus and 291,700 cm⁴ of inertia against 8423 cm³ and 310,092 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 33X141, with a second moment of area of 310,092 cm⁴ against 291,700 cm⁴ (6.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 33X141 vs UB 914×305×201W 30X148 vs H-800x300x14x26-210
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…