CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 30X173 vs HE 800 B

W 30X173 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 800 B is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. HE 800 B carries more bending: 10200 cm³ of plastic modulus against 9946.9 cm³, 2.5% more. They weigh essentially the same, 257.5 kg/m and 262 kg/m. HE 800 B is deeper, 800 mm against 772.2 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 30X173
W
HE 800 B
HE
Difference
Mass257.5 kg/m262 kg/m-1.7%
Depth772.2 mm800 mm-3.5%
Width381 mm300 mm+27.0%
Web thickness16.6 mm17.5 mm-5.1%
Flange thickness27.2 mm33 mm-17.6%
Area328.4 cm²334 cm²-1.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)342,558 cm⁴359,000 cm⁴-4.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)9,946.9 cm³10,200 cm³-2.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)8,865.4 cm³8,980 cm³-1.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)24,891 cm⁴14,900 cm⁴+67.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,015.6 cm³1,550 cm³+30.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)8.69 cm6.68 cm+30.1%
Torsion constant (It)649.3 cm⁴959 cm⁴-32.3%

W 30X173 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 800 B to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 800 B.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 800 B has the larger second moment of area: 359,000 cm⁴ against 342,558 cm⁴, a difference of 4.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (38.6 against 38.9 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 30X173 has 2015.6 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 1550 cm³, 30.0% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, HE 800 B is the stronger section and W 30X173 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

HE 800 B is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 10200 cm³ against 9946.9 cm³ - 2.5% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: W 30X173 is 257.5 kg/m and HE 800 B is 262 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 800 B gives 10200 cm³ of plastic modulus and 359,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 9946.9 cm³ and 342,558 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 800 B, with a second moment of area of 359,000 cm⁴ against 342,558 cm⁴ (4.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 33X169 vs HE 800 BHE 800 B vs H-800x300x17x34
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…