CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 33X201 vs H-900x300x18x34-286

W 33X201 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-900x300x18x34-286 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 12667.2 cm³ against 12500 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.3%. H-900x300x18x34-286 is the lighter of the two at 286 kg/m against 299.1 kg/m, a saving of 4.6% on steel weight. H-900x300x18x34-286 is deeper, 912 mm against 856 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 33X201
W
H-900x300x18x34-286
MB & MC
Difference
Mass299.1 kg/m286 kg/m+4.6%
Depth856 mm912 mm-6.1%
Width398.8 mm302 mm+32.1%
Web thickness18.2 mm18 mm+1.1%
Flange thickness29.2 mm34 mm-14.1%
Area381.3 cm²364 cm²+4.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)482,828 cm⁴497,800 cm⁴-3.0%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)12,667.2 cm³12,500 cm³+1.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)11,241.5 cm³10,920 cm³+2.9%
Second moment, minor (Iz)31,176 cm⁴15,670 cm⁴+99.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,408.9 cm³1,629 cm³+47.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.04 cm6.56 cm+37.8%
Torsion constant (It)865.8 cm⁴1,050 cm⁴-17.5%

W 33X201 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-900x300x18x34-286 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-900x300x18x34-286.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-900x300x18x34-286 has the larger second moment of area: 497,800 cm⁴ against 482,828 cm⁴, a difference of 3.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, H-900x300x18x34-286 is the more efficient section: 43.7 against 42.4 cm³ per kg/m, 3.1% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 33X201 has 2408.9 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 1629 cm³, 47.9% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.6% weight.

In short, W 33X201 is the stronger section and H-900x300x18x34-286 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 33X201 has a plastic modulus of 12667.2 cm³ and H-900x300x18x34-286 has 12500 cm³, a difference of only 1.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

H-900x300x18x34-286 at 286 kg/m, against 299.1 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.6%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-900x300x18x34-286 gives 12500 cm³ of plastic modulus and 497,800 cm⁴ of inertia against 12667.2 cm³ and 482,828 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-900x300x18x34-286, with a second moment of area of 497,800 cm⁴ against 482,828 cm⁴ (3.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 914×305×289 vs H-900x300x18x34-286W 36X194 vs H-900x300x18x34-286W 33X201 vs UB 914×305×289W 33X201 vs HE 900 BHE 900 B vs H-900x300x18x34-286
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…