CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 914×305×289 vs H-900x300x18x34-286

UB 914×305×289 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-900x300x18x34-286 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 12600 cm³ against 12500 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.8%. They weigh essentially the same, 289.1 kg/m and 286 kg/m. Both are about 919 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 914×305×289
UB
H-900x300x18x34-286
MB & MC
Difference
Mass289.1 kg/m286 kg/m+1.1%
Depth926.6 mm912 mm+1.6%
Width307.7 mm302 mm+1.9%
Web thickness19.5 mm18 mm+8.3%
Flange thickness32 mm34 mm-5.9%
Area368 cm²364 cm²+1.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)504,000 cm⁴497,800 cm⁴+1.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)12,600 cm³12,500 cm³+0.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)10,900 cm³10,920 cm³-0.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)15,600 cm⁴15,670 cm⁴-0.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,600 cm³1,629 cm³-1.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.51 cm6.56 cm-0.8%
Torsion constant (It)926 cm⁴1,050 cm⁴-11.8%

UB 914×305×289 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-900x300x18x34-286 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-900x300x18x34-286.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 914×305×289 has the larger second moment of area: 504,000 cm⁴ against 497,800 cm⁴, a difference of 1.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (43.6 against 43.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 914×305×289 has a plastic modulus of 12600 cm³ and H-900x300x18x34-286 has 12500 cm³, a difference of only 0.8% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 914×305×289 is 289.1 kg/m and H-900x300x18x34-286 is 286 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-900x300x18x34-286 gives 12500 cm³ of plastic modulus and 497,800 cm⁴ of inertia against 12600 cm³ and 504,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 914×305×289, with a second moment of area of 504,000 cm⁴ against 497,800 cm⁴ (1.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 914×305×289 vs HE 900 BUB 914×305×289 vs W 36X194W 36X194 vs H-900x300x18x34-286W 33X201 vs UB 914×305×289W 33X201 vs H-900x300x18x34-286HE 900 B vs H-900x300x18x34-286
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…