CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 33X263 vs HE 900 x 391

W 33X263 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 900 x 391 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 17042.5 cm³ against 17000 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.3%. They weigh essentially the same, 391.4 kg/m and 391 kg/m. HE 900 x 391 is deeper, 922 mm against 876.3 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 33X263
W
HE 900 x 391
HE
Difference
Mass391.4 kg/m391 kg/m+0.1%
Depth876.3 mm922 mm-5.0%
Width401.3 mm307 mm+30.7%
Web thickness22.1 mm25 mm-11.6%
Flange thickness39.9 mm46 mm-13.3%
Area499.4 cm²498 cm²+0.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)661,808 cm⁴674,000 cm⁴-1.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)17,042.5 cm³17,000 cm³+0.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)15,059.7 cm³14,600 cm³+3.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)43,288 cm⁴22,300 cm⁴+94.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)3,310.2 cm³2,310 cm³+43.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.3 cm6.7 cm+38.8%
Torsion constant (It)2,027 cm⁴2,600 cm⁴-22.0%

W 33X263 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 900 x 391 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 900 x 391.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 900 x 391 has the larger second moment of area: 674,000 cm⁴ against 661,808 cm⁴, a difference of 1.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (43.5 against 43.5 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 33X263 has 3310.2 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 2310 cm³, 43.3% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 33X263 has a plastic modulus of 17042.5 cm³ and HE 900 x 391 has 17000 cm³, a difference of only 0.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 33X263 is 391.4 kg/m and HE 900 x 391 is 391 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 900 x 391 gives 17000 cm³ of plastic modulus and 674,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 17042.5 cm³ and 661,808 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 900 x 391, with a second moment of area of 674,000 cm⁴ against 661,808 cm⁴ (1.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 914×419×388 vs HE 900 x 391W 36X247 vs HE 900 x 391W 36X256 vs HE 900 x 391
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…