CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 36X256 vs HE 900 x 391

W 36X256 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 900 x 391 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 17042.5 cm³ against 17000 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.3%. W 36X256 is the lighter of the two at 381 kg/m against 391 kg/m, a saving of 2.6% on steel weight. W 36X256 is deeper, 950 mm against 922 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 36X256
W
HE 900 x 391
HE
Difference
Mass381 kg/m391 kg/m-2.6%
Depth950 mm922 mm+3.0%
Width309.9 mm307 mm+0.9%
Web thickness24.4 mm25 mm-2.4%
Flange thickness43.9 mm46 mm-4.6%
Area485.8 cm²498 cm²-2.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)699,269 cm⁴674,000 cm⁴+3.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)17,042.5 cm³17,000 cm³+0.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)14,666.4 cm³14,600 cm³+0.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)21,977 cm⁴22,300 cm⁴-1.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,245 cm³2,310 cm³-2.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.73 cm6.7 cm+0.4%
Torsion constant (It)2,202 cm⁴2,600 cm⁴-15.3%

W 36X256 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 900 x 391 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 900 x 391.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 36X256 has the larger second moment of area: 699,269 cm⁴ against 674,000 cm⁴, a difference of 3.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 36X256 is the more efficient section: 44.7 against 43.5 cm³ per kg/m, 2.9% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.6% weight.

In short, W 36X256 is the stronger section and W 36X256 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 36X256 has a plastic modulus of 17042.5 cm³ and HE 900 x 391 has 17000 cm³, a difference of only 0.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 36X256 at 381 kg/m, against 391 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.6%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 900 x 391 gives 17000 cm³ of plastic modulus and 674,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 17042.5 cm³ and 699,269 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 36X256, with a second moment of area of 699,269 cm⁴ against 674,000 cm⁴ (3.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 914×419×388 vs HE 900 x 391W 36X247 vs HE 900 x 391W 36X256 vs UB 914×419×388W 33X263 vs HE 900 x 391
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…