CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 36X170 vs H-900x300x16x28-243

W 36X170 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-900x300x16x28-243 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. W 36X170 carries more bending: 10946.6 cm³ of plastic modulus against 10450 cm³, 4.8% more. H-900x300x16x28-243 is the lighter of the two at 243 kg/m against 253 kg/m, a saving of 4.1% on steel weight. W 36X170 is deeper, 919.5 mm against 900 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 36X170
W
H-900x300x16x28-243
MB & MC
Difference
Mass253 kg/m243 kg/m+4.1%
Depth919.5 mm900 mm+2.2%
Width304.8 mm300 mm+1.6%
Web thickness17.3 mm16 mm+8.1%
Flange thickness27.9 mm28 mm-0.4%
Area322.6 cm²310 cm²+4.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)437,043 cm⁴411,300 cm⁴+6.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)10,946.6 cm³10,450 cm³+4.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)9,520.9 cm³9,139 cm³+4.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)13,319 cm⁴12,650 cm⁴+5.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,373.2 cm³1,324 cm³+3.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.43 cm6.39 cm+0.6%
Torsion constant (It)628.5 cm⁴633 cm⁴-0.7%

W 36X170 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-900x300x16x28-243 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-900x300x16x28-243.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 36X170 has the larger second moment of area: 437,043 cm⁴ against 411,300 cm⁴, a difference of 6.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (43.3 against 43.0 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.1% weight.

In short, W 36X170 is the stronger section and H-900x300x16x28-243 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 36X170 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 10946.6 cm³ against 10450 cm³ - 4.8% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

H-900x300x16x28-243 at 243 kg/m, against 253 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.1%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-900x300x16x28-243 gives 10450 cm³ of plastic modulus and 411,300 cm⁴ of inertia against 10946.6 cm³ and 437,043 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 36X170, with a second moment of area of 437,043 cm⁴ against 411,300 cm⁴ (6.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 914×305×253 vs W 36X170UB 914×305×253 vs H-900x300x16x28-243W 36X170 vs HE 900 AHE 900 A vs H-900x300x16x28-243
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…